arrow right cross menu search arrow-left arrow-right menu open menu close plus minus

Sustainability 101 Pathway:

Top Grower Questions About Sustainability


Return to Pathway



It’s not just organizations that are confused about how to implement regenerative agriculture. Find out many of the frequently asked questions from growers about how to get started with sustainable farming and how to evaluate the technology used to measure it.

How do growers enroll in CIBO?

We developed a very simple way for a grower to enroll in the CIBO marketplace or join a customer’s enterprise private working space. Growers upload a field and through our simplified process, we can calculate within that moment how many credits they can generate based on their practices. Once a farmer has completed his or her enrollment, we use our own computer vision technology to verify their practices. Our platform gives estimates of how many carbon credits they can sell. Farmers input their practices and we are able to give them a quick and easy number. We make it as simple and easy for farmers to input and access their information in one place. It also gives them access to the full breadth of data about land they just enrolled.

What crop model do you use?

CIBO uses the SALUS model and it was developed by one of our co-founders, Dr. Bruno Basso. It models the growth of a crop over 300 different parameters from planting date, inputs, crop type, etc. Some of the other things that come out of that model are the carbon equivalent to a particular crop growing on a piece of land.

Do you guys use Process-based models for crop or more of a statistical model? Do you use crop models documented in the scientific literature e.g. crop models from the FAO?

We use a process-based model called SALUS, which models the growing crop as well as the ecosystem surrounding it. This model is well-documented in the scientific literature. Find out more about the science behind CIBO.

How accurate is your model on carbon sequestration?

We use a process-based model so we simulate the entire ecosystem. It’s an academic model that we transform into a scalable model that can be used commercially. We use published studies of soil carbon to test and calibrate our model. Here are some published results on model accuracy.

How does CIBO gain such detailed information including elevation and soil type?

We use SSURGO soil samples and publicly available soil maps as well as remote sensing. It allows us to get the details on the infield variability analysis. Our yield simulation is based on a crop modeling approach based on how a crop behaves over a growing season. What is its performance and how is it changing? It is also based on the specific understanding of that field’s conditions. CIBO combines modeling and simulation as one pillar to benchmark against county averages. Then, we combine AI and remote sensing to detect what is actually happening inside the field in the last day, week or specific time period. By combining both simulation and modeling with computervison and AI, CIBO is able to bring in the public, private, and proprietary data to produce scores, in field variability, crop identification. We blend it all together to make it bigger than the sum of its parts.

What is the percentage of farmer information used vs other? What is the percentage of projected information used by CIBO versus real-time?

CIBO has built a very flexible pipeline for ecosystem modeling. As a general rule, we use as much farmer data as we have available. We then supplement that data with inferences based on Computer Vision, as well as our database of common grower practices in different geographies. When we estimate past yields and historical practices on a field, we use recorded weather data. For in-season forecasting, we use recorded weather data up to the present, and a sheaf of weather forecasts (projections) for the remainder of the growing season.

How often is your satellite imagery updated?

We do not have our own satellites. We rely currently on a few public satellites, such as Landsat 8 (which produces an image every few weeks), and the newer Sentinel 2 (which produces an image every few days). We have also worked with private satellites. Some images have to be discarded, due to technical glitches in the satellites or cloud coverage obscuring the image. Taking all this into account, we generally have 3 or 4 images/month of a given field throughout the year.

USGS is a broad sword as far as soils. I have that the soil data show poor soil when it was actually good soil. How do you receive more accurate data through CIBO?

It’s true that the SSURGO soils database (from USGS) contains inaccuracies. When possible, we compare SSURGO data to actual soil samples. We’ve found that SSURGO is generally pretty accurate, although it may miss some small-scale details. We like to use soil samples from growers when those are available, to supplement or replace the larger-scale databases.

What are the specific data layers in the valuation model including soil, weather, etc? How does CIBO differ from other models? Do you use private data in your analysis?

We take a lot of public data sources that are relevant to CIBO like USDA valuation, historical practices, soil maps, etc. We take this data and put it in one place. On top of all this data, we layer it with remote vision, AI and modeling to provide a deeper understanding of the information. Visit CIBO’s blog for more information about our specific valuation approaches. When we take a look at the publicly available data, we use our own understanding of performance, stability, and valuation to find the difference between each piece of land in order to find its own unique agronomic value. CIBO has built a robust data infrastructure at a county level. We have agronomists who go through public information to validate it. We add our remote sensing data to this information and apply algorithms on top of it about the specific crops (our own IP). Together, with our agronomists, we give validation to our practices and agronomic data. We do license some data from third parties. This includes our owner information but we do not sell this information to others.

How accurate is the data feeding into these various models? Basically, how much can growers trust that these models will reflect their individual reality?

The purpose of models such as CIBO’s is not to replace the expertise of a grower who is walking through his own fields. That person is always going to know more about the soil, the weather, the specific variety of a crop planted, etc, and can probably make a good educated guess as to when the crop will mature and what the yield will be. The purpose of our models is to give the grower (and others) insight on a broader basis:  to have a better understanding of what is happening in his neighbors’ fields, in other counties, and other states.  Additionally, we wish to provide insights into things that can’t be observed directly, like the grower’s impact on soil health and carbon footprint. We are in a constant process of testing our models against measured data and making improvements where we see discrepancies.

Do you use videos from tractors or harvesters? Can we upload drone footage to you to receive a more accurate time frame? Would it not be beneficial to have a portal for the farmer on the ground to upload thermal or lidar data directly to CIBO for more accurate information on their properties?

We don’t use these types of data at present, although it’s an idea we have considered.  There are a couple of complications to take into account: Each of these image types would have to be processed differently from satellite imagery. We would have to develop completely separate processes to use such images. We’re trying to develop solutions that scale across the country, and potentially across the world. With satellite data, we can get information on any field in the world. Someday, tractor video images may be so common that we can rely on them for up-to-date information, but that seems to be far in the future.

Would your projections and modeling give farmers the opportunity to predict what would be more beneficial crop to plant in crop rotations?

Yes. Our models and interfaces allow the farmer, as well as the scientist, to ask “what if” questions around planting and management. Our interface provides projections of yield and readiness for harvest, as well as soil health metrics, on the basis of a management scenario.

Are the estimates made about crop growth progression and ideal harvest timing taking the risk of crop loss due to weather phenomena (like hail) into consideration? If so, are there any data sources you have found more model-friendly than others?

At present, no. The kinds of weather phenomena that cause crop loss are things like hail and tornadoes, which tend to be hyper-local.  We have not found any sources that reliably predict such phenomena on a local scale.

There are many other factors that influence crop yield or even carbon sequestration other than soil or weather. Arguably those are the two biggest. What level of grower input are you utilizing around management or cultural practices?

In addition to soil and weather, we consider a suite of management practices: choice of cultivar, planting dates, harvest dates, fertilizer practices, tillage practices, and cover cropping. All of these factors interact with each other in complicated ways that add up to the total carbon footprint of a farm. Over time, we intend to add additional factors, as well as creating more detailed and nuanced models of how these factors interact.

How does tillage affect productivity in your model?

Every field is different. In our model, tillage affects the soil characteristics, such a compaction and aeration, and indirectly affects the amount of soil carbon available in different soil layers. The net effect of this, in conjunction with the soil of the field, the weather, and other management practices, can have either a positive or negative impact on productivity, depending on the circumstances.

Does CIBO also assess the environmental impacts of the management practices used to improve the yield? For example, N leaching, N2O emissions?

Yes. That is something very important to us, as we are focused on scaling regenerative ag across the U.S. Our ecosystem models estimate the beneficial effects of applying additional fertilizer, as well as the direct results in nitrogen leaching and nitrous oxide emissions. We also estimate the indirect costs of producing nitrogen fertilizer, which is itself a significant contributor to greenhouse gases.

Inevitably (it seems) we will have 24/7 imagery to create a “live” view of crops globally. What is the next evolution of data science required to be valuable to managing ag systems?

We agree that there’s a trend toward more frequent and higher-resolution imagery. However, it’s a big leap from the few images a month that we currently have, to a live view with 24/7 imagery. Realistically, we doubt this will be achieved any time soon, as it would be very expensive, and market forces don’t seem strong enough. When it is a reality, it will make our jobs easier, but not fundamentally different. Some of the challenges in Computer Vision are related to image acquisition, but many are centered around the interpretation of those images. When we have more and better images, the challenges of interpretation will remain, and may even become larger.

Continue Learning About Sustainability

Return to the pathway to build your knowledge of regenerative agriculture

Return to Pathway

Download the eBook:

The Definitive Guide To Regenerative Agriculture

Download the eBook:

The Definitive Guide to Low Carbon Corn for Carbon Neutral Ethanol

Download the eBook:

Getting Started on Your Scope 3 Journey in Agriculture

Download the eBook:

Confidence in Carbon Modeling

Download the eBook:

The Current State of Net-Zero Target Setting and Accounting in Agriculture

Download the eBook:

Boots on the Ground: Accelerating Regenerative Agriculture Program adoption with CIBO’s Tech-Enabled Grower Network Partners